Security Screen Brand Comparison
The brand name on the screen matters less than the standard of the installation behind it.
Four brands compared
| Factor | Crimsafe | Prowler Proof | Invisi-Gard | SecureView |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mesh material | 304 woven stainless | Perforated stainless | 316 woven stainless | Perforated aluminium |
| Mesh thickness | 0.9mm | Sheet-based (varies) | 0.8mm typical | Sheet-based (varies) |
| Attachment | Patented Screw-Clamp | Wedge system | Proprietary clamp | Frame-fixed sheet |
| Impact testing | 550J/750J (UQ-tested) | Proprietary testing | Proprietary testing | Meets AS standard |
| Warranty | Up to 10 yrs + 2 conditional | Manufacturer-specified | Manufacturer-specified | Manufacturer-specified |
Key trade-offs
Prowler Proof
Distinctive perforated aesthetic; wedge-based fixing may be more vulnerable to high-force impact vs Screw-Clamp.
Invisi-Gard
316 marine-grade mesh gives a corrosion advantage, but the mesh is thinner (lower tensile strength).
SecureView (formerly Amplimesh)
The most affordable option; perforated aluminium with the lowest impact resistance of the four.
Honest conclusion: the brand name on the screen matters less than the standard of the installation behind it.
Related comparisons
Talk to an Authorised Crimsafe Licensee
Free measure at your home. 30-day price lock on every written quote.